International law is now completely dead.

26 July 2025, by Eric Zuesse. (All of my recent articles can be seen here.)

If it is not going to be enforced even now, regarding the extermination (genocide) to eliminate the Gazans (and there is zero indication that it will be), it is dead. If it will be enforced against anything else but not against that, then it will be so outrageously selective so that it reflects the sheer power of some imperialistic “higher power,” as to have no relationship whatsoever to any authentic justice, but ONLY to the ethic of psychopaths: “Might makes right.” But if might makes right, then what is law supposed to be about? Is it only about fulfilling the will of some fictitious “The Almighty” — a personification and idealization of power? So, whomever is powerless, such as the Gazans are now, and such as the people who were processed through Hitler’s concentration camps were then, “They have it coming to them” — they deserve it, because they are powerless against it? This is the new world, but it is really very ancient, and it shows that in social and political, and even economic affairs (after all, the Gazans were placed there because their land had been stolen from them by Zionists), humans have actually made no authentic progress at all.

On July 25th I headlined “Israel Now Admits to Exterminating Gazans. The Origin of this Genocide Goes Back to 2003.”

On July 23rd I headlined “HYPOCRISY ON STEROIDS, about the Gaza genocide”.

On July 12th I headlined “Israel’s Auschwitz for Palestinians: How It’s Being Carried Out Now”.

All of these are solidly documented news-reports about an ongoing event that is of immense historical significance, but no such reports get many page-views and reader-comments from the public. The public are far less interested in them than they are in ordinary news-events that are far less important and far less conclusive evidences that the world is descending deeper and deeper into the ideological victory of Adolf Hitler despite his loss in World War Two. And Israel, America, Germany, and UK, are at the forefront of what is now clearly Hitler’s ideological victory — the victory of racist-fascist-supremacist imperialism, or “nazism,” which is the common term for that ideology, Hitler’s ideology, and the Zionists’ ideology.

The most pro-Israel and anti-Palestinian countries — America and its European colonies — are so blind to the evilness of Israel’s ongoing ethnic cleansing and genocide against the residents of Gaza, and of its ongoing and accelerating land-thefts from the Palestinians in the West Bank, as to present the serious question of why these massive ongoing evils, which are of historic magnitude, are absent from their Governments’ official condemnations and (until recently) almost completely absent from these countries’ news-reports, even as-if these horrors weren’t being perpetrated by Israel with America’s weapons and satellite guidance and targeting, or weren’t even happening at all. There is a real blindness about the blindness, as if this tolerance of Israel’s (and America’s) genocide and land-theft against Palestinians simply were not so. But it is. What explains the blindness and the blindness about the blindness — the utter refusal — to acknowledge the evilness of Israel (and of the U.S. Government ever since Harry Truman created the state of Israel in 1948, even when the genocidal intent of Israel’s founders was already known both privately and publicly)?

Stupidity — believing the Israeli Government’s lies — is part of the answer. Especially the lie that to be anti-Israel is to be anti-Jew is obvious to everyone but idiots, because many Jews are anti-Israel — even some rabbis, both in America and in Israel, are against Israel — and this means that the equation between “Jew” and “Zionist” (supporter of Israel) is false. Only stupid people would believe it. Nonetheless, the Trump Administration and many throughout the world spout Israel’s lie that to be anti-Israel is to be anti-Jew (an “anti-Semite”); and, for example, prestigious American universities have expelled students for speaking publicly against Israel’s slaughter of Gazans — and the U.S. Government, despite the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment (which prohibits the Government’s suppressing public expressions of political opinions), has halted federal funds to universities that DON’T expel such students. The U.S. Government now blatantly violates the U.S. Constitution.

However, even many opponents of that lie falsify, by alleging that the Jewish religion does not support this ethnic cleansing and genocide. Here are a few examples from the Jewish religion’s alleged ‘holy texts’ or canonized Scriptures, specifically referring to what their ‘God’ wants, showing that this ‘God’ doesn’t merely want it but DEMANDS it:

Genesis 15:18-21

“On that day the Lord made a covenant with Abraham and said, ‘To your descendants I give this land, from the river of Egypt [the Nile] to the great river, the Euphrates, including the lands of the Kenites, the Kenizzites, the Kadmonites, the Hittites, the Perizzites, the Rephaim, the Amoriotes, the Caananites, the Girgashites, and the Jebusites.’”

Deuteronomy 7:1-2

“You must not let any living thing survive among the cities of these people the Lord your God is giving you as an inheritance: the Girgashites, the Amorites, the Caananites, the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites. You must put them all to death.”

Deuteronomy 7:16

“Destroy every nation that the Lord your God places in your power, and do not show them any mercy.”

Deuteronomy 20:16-18

“When you capture cities in the land he Lord your God is giving you, kill everyone. Completely destroy all the people: the Hittites, the Amorites, the Caananites, the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites, as the Lord has ordered you to do. Kill them so that they will not make you sin against the Lord by teaching you to do all the disgusting things they do in the worship of their gods.”

Israel’s Government takes such passages as ‘justifying’ what they do to Palestinians. And the vast majority of Israelis agree with that viewpoint. America’s Government says it doesn’t like what Israel is doing, but nonetheless continues to provide almost all of the weaponry and satellite intelligence in order to do it, and is therefore co-equal with Israel in doing this genocide, but (since America pretends to be not a theocratic nation [and our Constitution is entirely secular, so anything at all theocratic in the U.S. Government would actually be traitorous], and not even an aristocratic nation, but instead a democratic nation — though it now IS actually an aristocratic nation, a nation ruled by billionaires instead of by mere voters) America’s Government alleges that it isn’t participating in the genocide. That allegation by the U.S. Government, that it isn’t participating in this genocide, is clearly a lie.

Israel, therefore, does represent Judaism’s mythological god by its doing to the Gazans what it is doing to them (exterminating them), and also by doing to Palestinians in the West Bank what it is doing to them (ethnically cleansing them). Self-alleged Jews — including some rabbis — who say otherwise (that Judaism isn’t intrinsically racist and even genocidally so), are clearly lying about the Jewish religion, by saying that being a follower of the Jewish religion does NOT necessarily entail being a Zionist (a supporter of such biblical passages as I have just quoted). Though Zionism, as a political movement, started only with Theodor Herzl’s pamphlet The Jewish Nation in 1896, Zionism had been an intrinsic part of the Jewish faith ever since that faith’s Scripture, the Torah, which includes those passages, which — regarding these passages — Israel is now trying to finalize in both Gaza and the West Bank (and a bit beyond), which Scripture became Judaism’s Torah, or ultimate holy Scripture, at some time during the 6th-5th Century BC. (Which was long before Zionism as a political movement even existed.) Since that ancient time, every Jewish assembly place or synagogue has had a Torah, the religion’s ‘holy book’. It is the basis of the Jewish religion, and before that, Jews were simply tribes. But Zionism turned those evill Biblical passages into a political movement, and this happened starting in 1881, “in reaction to tsarist pogroms, formed the Ḥovevei Ẕiyyon (“Lovers of Zion”) to promote the settlement of Jewish farmers and artisans in Palestine.” Until those pogroms, which were instigated if not encouraged by the devoutly Christian Tsar Alexander III, there WAS no Zionism. This Jewish-nazi movement started in reaction to that Christian-nazi Tsar.

Judaism’s hatred of, and desire to destroy, the Palestinians, is as old as is the faith itself, though it did not become politically activated until Tsar Alexander III precipitated it. For this reason, I headlined on 14 August 2017, “Netanyahu’s Pro-Nazi Lie: ‘Hitler Wanted To Expel The Jews’”: Netanyahu blamed Palestinians — NOT Christians — for the Holocaust. He said this despite Hitler himself having been a Catholic, and that Church having held a solemn private (but attended by Bormann and Goebbels) Memorial Mass for him, on 6 May 1945, a week after his suicide. Hitler was born, lived, and died, as a Catholic. But the nazi Netanyahu blamed those Muslims — no Christian.

However, there is nothing unique about Judaism’s racism. Consider, for example, that the Christians, not just Hitler but all of the Nazi leaders, and the 94% of Germans in that time who called themselves “Christian,” WERE Christians. Why do Jewish nazis ignore this fact? Whereas many Jews want to exterminate Palestinians, many Christians have wanted to exterminate Jews. Many Christians cooperated with the Holocaust, and some of them were even proud to do so.

For example, as regards the Christian clergy, they very predominantly supported Hitler’s anti-Semitism, and they even provided to his Government the documentation as to whom was and therefore also whom was NOT a Christian — the basic data from which the Holocaust’s “Jews” would be selected for extermination — and they were proud to do it:

Eberhard Bethge, who had been a liberal Protestant cleric during the Third Reich, was interviewed in the last chapter of Augustin Hedberg's 1992 FAITH UNDER FIRE and was asked what those years had been like. Bethge commented, “‘Bad blood’ was the great term. You had to have Aryan blood.” Hitler, in only his private statements, had defined “Aryan,” as pureblooded Christian. Bethge’s interviewer inquired, “So we know this Jewish poison [Jewish blood] had to be cleansed. How did they propose to do that?” Bethge replied, tellingly: “For instance, everybody in an office, in a village, in a city, in a province, in Berlin, had to prove that he had [only] Aryan ancestors. How could he do that? He could do it only if he wrote to church officers in the villages or in the cities and asked them to look in the old books of the church in which baptisms were recorded. So many pastors and church secretaries had to work for hours and hours, weeks and months to answer all these requests. ‘Please give me an excerpt out of the church files that proves my ancestors had been Christians.’ The church officers and the ministers, they didn't care. They did that. They said, 'How important we are now.’ I was an assistant curator in the winter of '33. I had to sit all morning and look through the books and answer these letters.” It was therefore the Christian clergy themselves — people indoctrinated with John 8:44, and Matthew 27:25, and Matthew 23:31-36, and Luke 19:27, etc. — who were the proud implementers of the indispensable first step in the Nazis’ 12-year-long “racist” war against the Jews, by supplying the crucial raw data for segregating-out Jews. Bethge was even honest enough to admit, “We were anti-Semitic, and we thought this was Christian.” (Of course, they did, because it was, and they had absorbed this from Christianity’s Scripture.) The essential first step in the “final solution” was this identification of who was NOT an “Aryan,” who WAS “a Jew.” Hitler commanded this first step in the year he came into power, 1933, and the Christian clergy executed it with pride. And yet even today, so-called “historians” say that Hitler didn’t have execution of the Jews in mind from the very start, and that Hitler was no Christian, and so forth.

The Catholic-raised Hitler took very seriously such anti-Semitic New-Testament statements as, from ‘Jesus,’ John 8:44, Matthew 23:31-38, and Luke 19:27; and from Paul, 1 Thes. 2:14-16. (Hitler even said to his followers, on 18 December 1926, “The teachings of Christ have laid the foundations for the battle against the Jews as the enemy of Mankind; the work that Christ began, I shall finish.” Then, on 26 April 1933, he told the Pope’s representative, “I am doing what the Church has done for 1,500 years. I am simply finishing the job.”) All of that was Christian racism against Jews. Furthermore, virtually all of Germany’s Nazis were Christians — committed to the New Testament — and, in fact, that (an applicant’s purebred Christianity) was a requirement in order to join the Party, and ESPECIALLY in order to join the SS, as is documented in a 13,000-word masterpiece of an article by Coel Hellier, on “Nazi racial ideology was religious, creationist and opposed to Darwinism”, which can leave no intelligent reader to doubt that the Nazi Party was itself a Christian movement, which historical fact is covered-up by ‘journalists’ and ‘historians’ (but exposed and documented by the primary sources cited in that article — they’re all authentic).

In addition to this: On 21 October 1941, Hitler, in the privacy of his bunker, concluded a long tirade against Jews (as transcribed in his Table-Talk) by saying: “By exterminating this pest, we shall do humanity a service of which our soldiers can have no idea.” Hitler’s buddy, Himmler, stated, in a speech to top SS leaders, two years later, when the Holocaust was in full swing, on 4 October 1943, that this extermination was necessary for them to carry out, in order to have “exterminated a bacterium because we do not want in the end to be infected by the bacterium and die of it.” Hitler had stated, on various occasions, that the “Jewish infection” or “Jewish bacterium” or “blood-poisoning by Jews,” was transmitted to non-Jews in their “blood,” and so Jews must be entirely eradicated like plague-carrying rats — not only in Germany, but beyond. Hitler said, on 24 February 1943: “This fight will not end with the planned annihilation of the Aryan [which to him meant the descendants of Adam and Eve in Genesis 3 — and the snake was, according to the NT, the father of the Jews] but with the extermination of the Jew [which to Hitler meant the descendants of the snake in Genesis 3] in Europe. Beyond this, thanks to this fight, our movement’s world of thought will become the common heritage of all people.” He meant “all people” — he aimed to eliminate all Jews — not merely in Germany, and for Germans, but everywhere. (Yet, still, there are Holocaust-deniers who say that the Holocaust is just ‘a Jewish hoax’, or that if it happened, Hitler didn’t know about it. Some people are stupid enough to reiterate such blatantly false tropes.) Or, as Hitler stated it in his last official words, his “Political Testament” right before his suicide: “Above all I charge the leaders of the nation and those under them to scrupulous observance of the laws of race and to merciless opposition to the universal poisoner of all peoples, international Jewry.” (His phrase “international Jewry” referred to Jews in all nations. He didn’t make any explicit reference here to exterminating them, because this statement from him was intended to be public — not merely private. He was explicit about it ONLY in his private statements, such as I have quoted.)

Furthermore, that 24 February 1943 quotation ISN’T from the flawed Trevor-Roper publication of the Table-Talk but instead from an authentic private speech that Hitler gave on that date, and the varying translations of which were discussed in an 8 March 1943 OSS Memorandum http://www7.bbk.ac.uk/thepursuitofthenazimind/FDR/DSCN2002.jpg by Walter Langer to William Donovan. The 1941 quotation from Hitler isn’t only in the original German version of the Table-Talk but was quoted in a book by Winston Churchill in 1948, four years before any translated version of the Table-Talks (Tischgesprache) (and this includes the one issued by Trevor-Roper) was published. The Himmler quotation is likewise accepted as authentic by historians.

Moreover, Horst von Maltitz perceptively observed in this regard in his excellent 1973 The Evolution of Hitler’s Germany (p. 171), that “railroad transport trains carrying Jews from the West to extermination camps in Poland were given priority over trains for urgently needed troops and war supplies. Moreover, skilled Jewish laborers, desperately needed in the munitions plants in occupied Poland, were carted off to extermination centers, in spite of strong objections by plant managers.” And, according to the Polish Ambassador, Jan Ciechanowski, in his 1947 Defeat in Victory (p. 179), he had personally handed U.S. President Roosevelt in the White House on 28 July 1943 a memo that, “The unprecedented destruction of the entire Jewish population is not motivated by Germany’s military requirements. Hitler and his subordinates aim at the total destruction of the Jews before the war ends and regardless of its outcome.”

And, as I pointed out in my 2000 WHY the Holocaust Happened: Its Religious Cause & Scholarly Cover-Up (see summary of it here), Hitler said that “Aryans” have remained unchanged since the time God first created Man (Adam and Eve). Thus, Mein Kampf asserted that the objective was “to give the Almighty Creator beings as He Himself created them.” Though during his later years Hitler was trying to adopt a scientific view, he failed, and Hitler even in his war bunker on the night of 25 January 1942, confided that Darwinian evolution does not apply to Man, who “has always been as he is now.” This was NOT an atheistic type of racism; it was SPECIFICALLY Biblical, a religious type of racism, despite all of the propaganda to the contrary (which has fooled almost all of the Hitler ‘experts’ ever since — though the evidence proves conclusively that the contrary is true).

Consequently, it will be good here to quote the most important New Testament origins of Hitler’s — and many other Christians’ — Holocaust:

John 8:44

“You are the children of your father, the Devil, and you want to follow your father’s desires. From the very beginning, he was a murderer, and has never been on the side of truth, becuse there is no truth in him. When he tells a lie, he is only doing what is natural to him, because he is a liar and the father of all lies.”

Matthew 23:31-38

“So, you actually admit that you are the descendants of those who murdered the prophets! Go on, then, and finish up what your ancestors started. You snakes and sons of snakes! How do you expect to escape being condemned to hell? And so I will tell you that I will send you prophets and wise men and teachers; you will kill some of them, crucify others, and whip others in the synagogues and chase them from town too town. As a result, the punishement for the murder of all innocent men will fall on you. … The punishment for all of these murders will fall on the people of this day!”

Luke: 19:27

“Now, as for all those enemies of mine who did not want me to be their king, bring them here, and kill them in my presence!” (This is told as the closing line of a parable.)

Paul 1 Thessalonians 2:14-16

“You suffered the same persecutions from your own countrymen that they suffered from the Jews who killed the Lord Jesus and the prophets and persecuted us. How displeasing they are to God! How hostile they are to everyone! They even tried to stop us from preaching to the Gentiles the message that would bring them salvation. In this way, they have completed the full total of the sins they have always committed. And now God’s anger has at last come down on them!”

To put those passages into their true historical context: Paul never met nor heard the living Jesus but wrote the earliest of all documents that came to be canonized in the year 393 by the Roman Catholic Church and later adopted by all other Christian churches; and his followers wrote the four canonical Gospel-accounts of ‘the words of Jesus’ but even in their time Jesus’s having been a rabbi who had preached Judaism (NOT Christianity) was so well known so that 3 out of the 4 canonized Gospel accounts of ‘Jesus’ mentioned specifically that his disciples sometimes addressed him simply as “rebbi” rabbi: Matthew 23:7, 23:8, 26:25, 26:49; Mark 9:5, 11:21, 14:45; and John 1:38, 1:49, 3:2, 3:26, 4:31, 6:25, 9:2, and 11:8. They could not deny it, because to have tried to would have been too obviously false and thus Paul’s new religion would have been recognized for what it actually was, not as they wanted it to become — they were evangelists for Paul’s religion, which they believed to be true because Paul told them that it was.

As I documented in my 2012 CHRIST’S VENTRILOQUISTS, Paul created Christianity in the year 49 or 50 in order to get back at Jesus’s brother James who was heading the former Jesus-created sect of Jews and finally decided that the by-then thousands of uncircumcised (or Gentile) men in Paul’s congregations would either be circumcised in accord with Genesis 17:14 or else be expelled from the sect. That is the reason why Christianity is anti-Jewish (anti-Semitic): James finally decided to enforce Genesis 17:14 (in that age when no such things as anesthetics nor antibiotics existed — and circumcision was therefore almost always perpetrated upon only infants, who didn’t volunteer for it and whose screams adults didn’t take seriously).

“Historians” have not been doing their job, for the truth. That’s why the general public cannot separate propaganda from history — the latter is just an extension of the former. Compare this account of the origin off how the Nazis managed to identify who was “a Jew” and who was not, that was given in a traditional history book on that topic, Edwin Black's 2001 IBM AND THE HOLOCAUST. Christianity’s role is ignored.

So: Zionists such as Netanyahu can’t blame Christianity for the Holocaust; they need Christian believers to blame Palestinians instead — people who had nothing to do with it — this was instead a Christian operation. The historical truth and context behind the 7 October 2023 event needs to be, and has effectively been, hidden from the publics in America, and in its European colonies.

There is a Big Lie, and, this time, it comes not from Germany’s racist-fascist-imperialist-supremacist (or ideologically nazi) Nazi Party and all the rest of Christendom, but instead from Judaism’s own racist-fascist-imperialist-supremacist Zionists and all the rest of Judaism.

And what about Islam’s equivalent? That is the jihadists, the fundamentalist Arab Sunni (U.S. propaganda lies that it’s instead fundamentalist Iranian Shiite) movement that includes both al-Qaeda and ISIS and whose former leader in Iraq and Syria, Abu Mohammad al-Julani, Donald Trump made a deal with on May 14th for Syria to become a U.S. colony, now that this former al-Qaeda and then ISIS leader, whom both Obama and Biden, and also Trump, had protected ever since 2012, finally succeeded (with U.S.-supplied weapons and training) at overthrowing Syria’s secular President Bashar al-Assad, and started the ethnic cleansing in Syria against Shiite Muslims and Christians there (that isn’t being reported in the U.S. empire).

So, in what way was the victory of the Allies in WW2 an ideological victory? Although both Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR) and Joseph Stalin were passionately AGAINST imperialism, both Winston Churchill and Harry Truman were FOR it, and it was THEY (Churchill and Truman) who ended up generating the world we have today, as being Cecil Rhodes’s 1877-conceived joint Anglo-American-Zionist global empire, which in WW2 had — with Stalin — defeated Hitler’s intended global empire of an “Aryan,” 100% pure-bred Christian and entirely Jew-free world, Hitler’s “Paradise” (as he called it) being ruled by the 100% pure-bred descendants of, as Hitler read the Bible, Adam and Eve, and with NO surviving descendants of the snake or Satan, which, in the New Testament (John 8:44, Matt. 23:31-38, etc.), Jews are (as Hitler viewed them). All three of the Big Three WW2 Allies, working together, won WW2, against the fascist Axis powers, but then, Harry Truman became America’s President, and he and Churchill, working together, intentionally created the Cold War by reversing the post-WW2 plan that FDR had had, of working together with Stalin under an FDR-designed anti-imperialist United Nations. Stalin would have cooperated with FDR, but he could not cooperate with Churchill and Truman. Stalin was anti-imperialist like FDR had been; and, so, we have had, after WW2, a continuation of the prior world-order, of contesting empires — exactly what FDR had so carefully planned to AVOID. The ideological victory thus went to the racist-fascist-supremacist-imperialists: Churchill and Truman. They — those two fascists — took up Hitler’s goal of defeating Russia. FDR would have isolated Churchill (would have decisivelly ended the British Empire), not Stalin. The way that Truman started the Cold War was by telling Stalin that the U.S. Government must share authority with the Soviet Goverment over the lands that Stalin’s forces had freed from Hitler’s control. Stalin said no. Truman and Churchill thus (in accord with the Rhodes-conceived, but Churchill-named, “Special Relationship”) took up Hitler’s goal of ultimately conquering Russia. And America and its colonies (‘allies’) have continued this war, the Cold War, right up to the present.

Hitler had had no idea that the Christian faith and its New Testament were actually products of Paul and his followers, and that Paul in the year 49 or 50 turned against Jesus’s brother James who now headed the Jesus sect of Jews, and that Paul broke away from that sect to create his own new religion, which rejected the circumcision commandment which James in that year finally ordered Paul to impose upon his Gentile congregations. Hitler believed that the Bible was instead the “Monumental History of Mankind” — fact, no fiction — and tried to understand it as being 100% true. So, he absorbed both the racism of the Old Testament and the Jew-hatred of the New Testament, and this is the reason why he said on 21 October 1941 that “Jesus was not a Jew.” And, as I mentioned, he said on 18 December 1926, “The teachings of Christ have laid the foundatioons for the battle against Jews as the enemy of Mankind; the work that Christ began, I shall finish.” Then, on 26 April 1933, he told the Pope’s representative, “I am doing what the Church has done for 1,500 years. I am simply finishing the job.”

It is, by now, undeniable that the Zionists, who are racist-fascist-supremacist-imperialist Jews, are the Jewish equivalents of Hitler’s Christian nazis — Jewish nazis to eliminate Palestinians, just as were the Christian nazis to eliminate Jews.

Churchill was likewise a nazi, but neither of Hitler’s type, nor of the Zionists’ type, but he intensely supported the Zionists’ cause, because his political career was financed largely by extremely wealthy Jews, and not only by extremely wealthy Christians. For example, the Jewish banker and financier, Sir Henry Edouard Strakosch, who had wealth from South African gold mines, paid off Churchill’s huge debts in 1938 and 1940. Furthermore, Churchill had been a protégé of Cecil Rhodes, and after Rhodes’s death in 1902 was the most effective of all of his protégés at actually achieving the “Special Relationship” that Rhodes had first proposed in 1877 — Rhodes’ goal of retrieving the U.S. for the UK. (Soon, the UK became subordinate in the relationship.) Allegedly, Rhodes — who built up an enormous fortune in South African gold and diamond mines — was financially backed by Lord Baron Lionel Nathan de Rothschild, and the allegation is actually true; the details were actually provided in John Flint’s 1974 biography, Cecil Rhodes, starting on page 86: then, on pages 92 and 93 is quoted from Rhodes’s 1888 will, “I leave … the balance of my property to Lord Rothschild.” And, then, “the world’s greatest financier was instructed, somewhat brusuely and sketchily, to use the money to establish the beloved society of the Imperiall elect.” Flint also notes that “Rothschild’s name appeared in Rhodes’s subsequent wills, and it is probable that his influence helped later to transform the mad scheme for a secret society into that which set up the Rhodes Scholarships.” As I pointed out at that last link, Churchill and General Eisenhower persuaded Truman to start the Cold War, on 25 July 1945. Eisenhower’s argument especially impressed Truman.

Truman, likewise, started the nation of Israel on 14 May 1948, and the reasons he gave for it were Biblical. He was a total fool, easily manipulated by exploiting his prejudices (in that case, his agreement with Hitler that the Bible is the monumental history of mankind — though Truman focused on the Old, and Hitler on the New, Testament).

Churchill was retired from politics when Truman created Israel, but Churchill had worked previously for this objective. However, his motivation for it was more directly racist (the type of racism that Rhodes himself had had) than Truman’s. Here is how Churchill had expressed it:

In a 12 March 1937 testimony before the Peel Commission on Palestine, Churchill revealed the racist and "white supremacist" basis of his support for the Zionist project (the testimony was only [first] published in 1982 — in Martin Gilbert, Winston S. Churchill Companion Volume 5, Part 3: The Coming of War, 1936-1939, 1982, p. 616). He said there:

“I do not agree that the dog in the manger has the final right to the manger, even though he may have lain there for a very long time. I do not admit that right. I do not admit, for instance, that a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America, or the black people of Australia. I do not admit that a wrong has been done to these people by the fact that a stronger race, a higher grade race, a more worldly-wise race, to put it that way, has come in and taken their place.” [Churchill requested that this statement by him not be published in the Peel Commission’s official eport, and it was not.] It is shown here.

So, that’s the historical background for the current death of international law. Because Truman fundamentally reversed FDR’s anti-imperialist plan for the U.N. (and ‘historians’ never said so), we now have reached the utter failure of the WW2 Allies’ ‘victory’, and need to reconstruct the U.N. on the basis of the plan for it that the U.N.’s inventor had been intending it to be.

If some of this is news to you, all of it is solidly documented history. Based on the actual documentation, none of this is really news. You can decide for yourself what the actual history here is, and I have linked through to the sources so as to facilitate your checking out anything here that you question. There is more of real history in this 5,000-word article than in a typical 500-page history-book.

—————

Investigative historian Eric Zuesse’s latest book, AMERICA’S EMPIRE OF EVIL: Hitler’s Posthumous Victory, and Why the Social Sciences Need to Change, is about how America took over the world after World War II in order to enslave it to U.S.-and-allied billionaires. Their cartels extract the world’s wealth by control of not only their ‘news’ media but the social ‘sciences’ — duping the public.