Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Hillary Han's avatar

Unfortunately, America lacks the people power, which more and more is being squashed by the billionaire empire of the globalists who run the government. Our weakness for debt--personal/national, our obsession with medical interventions, our dependence on the military, our self-unawareness of being driven to civil and global unrest, and our complete fear/lack/desire to learn true-news instead of propaganda-mainstreammedia which hypes up "the enemy". The majority of Americans live in a bubble, which pains me to say, might get worse, as they try to ignore that truth--which you, Eric, have so brilliantly pointed out--in order to maintain American-identity. The Chinese people are strong in numbers and much more unified, which gives them strength. The education system in China is exceptional. The Chinese government invests in the people. But what they lack is more freedom. Russia on the other hand, has very strong people, who can rely on each other, with a history which brings them pride and connection. . . I think Russia is the strongest nation on Earth, and we are watching the reality of that right now! . . .

I haven't watched Scott Ritter's talk with Judge Napolitano just yet, but I have watched this Danny Haiphong talk with Scott Ritter, Col. Lawrence Wilkerson and Garland Nixson, and it is excellent.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v6lM0C8qR5Y

Thank you, Eric.

Expand full comment
arthur brogard's avatar

Only we will provide the answer ? I don't think so. We can provide opinions but the facts will decide the answer won't they?

I find this an excellent essay for my purposes especially a portion of it and therefore I wish that portion were available as a separate essay.

Beginning at: 'From an economic standpoint'

and ending at: 'Trump is not exception to this'

It covers the essence, the history of this great evil the usa has inflicted on the world.

It leaves out the preamble: about 'leading nation' which is a different topic and it leaves out the last portion which is about the real significance of the drone/airfields attack and Ritter etc. and censorship, another different topic/s.

For my purposes. Which is/are to point people towards clear enunciation of the major facts and that's what that central portion does. I could point people to it and have some confidence that they would read it and be convinced, be persuaded of the truth of it.

The other two portions would simply confuse the issue for them. I am not at all saying they are not valid, just that together the full triad is too much to try to funnel into their heads.

I do querying the assertion that the Ritter Napolitano interview is banned in the usa. I don't know the truth. It surprises me if so. I've believed Napolitano broadcasts freely to the usa.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts