I don't believe Trump did any such thing. He just talks. We all know that. We've had people on YT and elsewhere spelling it out: the nuclear sub fleet doesn't work like that. It'd be downright barmy for him to insist it be done and it'd be barmier still if they actually followed orders.
We are a long way from the opening stages but he's still following the script he told the world he follows in the opening stage of his 'masterful' deal making: i.e. exorbitant, outlandish ambit claims that throw them offguard and then he drops down to something more reasonable and they accept it with a sigh of relief.
Not very high tech is he, is it? Just like a bit of a wicked child who gets his own way in the home because everyone is 'frightened' of his next tantrum. 'Frightened' in quotes because no one is really frightened of the child. It could be very small, could be very weak, could be it never does anything physical. But 'frightened' merely of the noise, the disturbance, the unhappiness brought into the home if this kid doesn't get what it wants..
Most ridiculous things... got to have that cushion, got to have that chair, got to go first.. any stupid thing. Absurd and outlandish things. I have seen this before.
Such people don't seem to have a psychiatric or psychological category of their own but their behaviour is seen as a set of behaviours that people with different conditions could use. i.e. its seen as a symptom set rather than a 'type'.
As a 'type' I think perhaps it's best described as ODD - Oppositional Defiant Disorder because so much of the symptology is the same. We can observe the underlying defiant opposition to authority in behaviour such as Donald's, in this symptom set, but it is not quite as clear, as overt, as a downright 'rebel' say, or truculent anti-social character.
So it doesn't fit exactly but its pretty close. It's kinda a more sly and cunning way of defeating authority. Instead of meeting authority on its own ground: legal, physical force, moral argument perhaps, it leaps immediately to another level, going beyond the norm entirely, into the realm of the absurd, the ridiculous, the unknown.
It is cleverer in that respect, without a doubt. It is a 'thought out' oppositional defiance, not an instinctive reaction.
This is what I think Donald is, an ODD for want of a better word. His basic shtick in that case is to demonstrate that he must never be taken for granted for he has the power at all times to spoil anything, everything. It masquerades as 'giving' and 'fixing' etc. but the essence of it is the threat to break, to despoil. That's clear and obvious in the description of the methodology of the 'art of the deal' : go beyond all bounds, impose your own rules, break everything, then take what you want.
What stops them? How to handle them? In the real world, in the home, they always find accommodation, everyone does as they say essentially, the home becomes 'run' by them. Under therapy, of course, great trouble is taken not to upset them. Kindness is showered upon them. Maybe it works, maybe it doesn't.
But in the real world outside of the home and especially with cases with such a potential for great damage such accommodations don't help. They cannot be allowed to 'run the home'.
So they have to be told 'No'. And then the tantrum has to be taken in our stride and any damage dealt with. Not be 'frightened' by it and turn to appeasement. No. Just continue the 'No' and handle what comes.
In the real, real world out here where things are really nitty gritty and people are being killed, blown apart murderously and excruciatingly deprived of their lives such people if they get to where their tantrum responses are really dangerous simply need putting down or at least putting away.
Imho, the truly scary thing is not JDT currently "reigning" in the Oval Office, but a "system" so deeply corrupt that a psycho like him is the apparently best option the US plebes has to vote for ... 🤮🤮🤮
All is uncertainty and confusion, it seems to me, even this late in the day. There seems no clarity as to what is really going on. None. Is Trump there by accident or design? If 'design' then whose design?
That's the first question and it is followed immediately by:
Now he is there is he a free agent?
If not, then who/what controls him?
I know of nowhere/no one that I can look to for definitive answers. :(
Since decades, the global hullaballoo has been purposefully been in the making, submerged in order to get solid foundations ready. By launching Kough-19 it "surfaced" to become fully actionable. Its global planners have lost any sense of shame of fear of accountability because they "own" the law-makers; very clearly are all beyond reach of "The Law" ...
JDT converted to Judaism/Zionism in 2017 and received more than 250 million USD from AIPAC. Knowing his actions during 2025, it's easy to conclude whether he is "free" or not ... Take your pick.
There is NO definitive answer for ANYTHING in the vast universe ...
Humanity's knowledge, experience and tools are very restricted; ignorance rules supremely, which is no coincidence either ...
That's the main reason, aliens continue to do their best to avoid any direct contact ... Their universal motto being: NEVER argue with fools !!! 🤣🤣🤣
"No, Donald Trump did not convert to Judaism. While his daughter, Ivanka Trump, converted to Judaism before marrying Jared Kushner, there is no evidence or reporting that suggests Donald Trump himself converted. Ivanka Trump converted to Judaism in 2009 prior to her marriage. "
I don't believe Trump did any such thing. He just talks. We all know that. We've had people on YT and elsewhere spelling it out: the nuclear sub fleet doesn't work like that. It'd be downright barmy for him to insist it be done and it'd be barmier still if they actually followed orders.
We are a long way from the opening stages but he's still following the script he told the world he follows in the opening stage of his 'masterful' deal making: i.e. exorbitant, outlandish ambit claims that throw them offguard and then he drops down to something more reasonable and they accept it with a sigh of relief.
Not very high tech is he, is it? Just like a bit of a wicked child who gets his own way in the home because everyone is 'frightened' of his next tantrum. 'Frightened' in quotes because no one is really frightened of the child. It could be very small, could be very weak, could be it never does anything physical. But 'frightened' merely of the noise, the disturbance, the unhappiness brought into the home if this kid doesn't get what it wants..
Most ridiculous things... got to have that cushion, got to have that chair, got to go first.. any stupid thing. Absurd and outlandish things. I have seen this before.
Such people don't seem to have a psychiatric or psychological category of their own but their behaviour is seen as a set of behaviours that people with different conditions could use. i.e. its seen as a symptom set rather than a 'type'.
As a 'type' I think perhaps it's best described as ODD - Oppositional Defiant Disorder because so much of the symptology is the same. We can observe the underlying defiant opposition to authority in behaviour such as Donald's, in this symptom set, but it is not quite as clear, as overt, as a downright 'rebel' say, or truculent anti-social character.
So it doesn't fit exactly but its pretty close. It's kinda a more sly and cunning way of defeating authority. Instead of meeting authority on its own ground: legal, physical force, moral argument perhaps, it leaps immediately to another level, going beyond the norm entirely, into the realm of the absurd, the ridiculous, the unknown.
It is cleverer in that respect, without a doubt. It is a 'thought out' oppositional defiance, not an instinctive reaction.
This is what I think Donald is, an ODD for want of a better word. His basic shtick in that case is to demonstrate that he must never be taken for granted for he has the power at all times to spoil anything, everything. It masquerades as 'giving' and 'fixing' etc. but the essence of it is the threat to break, to despoil. That's clear and obvious in the description of the methodology of the 'art of the deal' : go beyond all bounds, impose your own rules, break everything, then take what you want.
What stops them? How to handle them? In the real world, in the home, they always find accommodation, everyone does as they say essentially, the home becomes 'run' by them. Under therapy, of course, great trouble is taken not to upset them. Kindness is showered upon them. Maybe it works, maybe it doesn't.
But in the real world outside of the home and especially with cases with such a potential for great damage such accommodations don't help. They cannot be allowed to 'run the home'.
So they have to be told 'No'. And then the tantrum has to be taken in our stride and any damage dealt with. Not be 'frightened' by it and turn to appeasement. No. Just continue the 'No' and handle what comes.
In the real, real world out here where things are really nitty gritty and people are being killed, blown apart murderously and excruciatingly deprived of their lives such people if they get to where their tantrum responses are really dangerous simply need putting down or at least putting away.
Thanks for your detailed post !!! 👍👍👍
Imho, the truly scary thing is not JDT currently "reigning" in the Oval Office, but a "system" so deeply corrupt that a psycho like him is the apparently best option the US plebes has to vote for ... 🤮🤮🤮
All is uncertainty and confusion, it seems to me, even this late in the day. There seems no clarity as to what is really going on. None. Is Trump there by accident or design? If 'design' then whose design?
That's the first question and it is followed immediately by:
Now he is there is he a free agent?
If not, then who/what controls him?
I know of nowhere/no one that I can look to for definitive answers. :(
Ordo ab chaos ...
Since decades, the global hullaballoo has been purposefully been in the making, submerged in order to get solid foundations ready. By launching Kough-19 it "surfaced" to become fully actionable. Its global planners have lost any sense of shame of fear of accountability because they "own" the law-makers; very clearly are all beyond reach of "The Law" ...
JDT converted to Judaism/Zionism in 2017 and received more than 250 million USD from AIPAC. Knowing his actions during 2025, it's easy to conclude whether he is "free" or not ... Take your pick.
There is NO definitive answer for ANYTHING in the vast universe ...
Humanity's knowledge, experience and tools are very restricted; ignorance rules supremely, which is no coincidence either ...
That's the main reason, aliens continue to do their best to avoid any direct contact ... Their universal motto being: NEVER argue with fools !!! 🤣🤣🤣
a google enquiry brought this:
"No, Donald Trump did not convert to Judaism. While his daughter, Ivanka Trump, converted to Judaism before marrying Jared Kushner, there is no evidence or reporting that suggests Donald Trump himself converted. Ivanka Trump converted to Judaism in 2009 prior to her marriage. "
Knowing his actions during 2025, it does not even matter any more if he converted or not ...
that's right. I'm just trying to help keep our altmedia narratives more scrupulously correct than mainstream rubbish. :)