"But I don’t think any of them ever anticipated the possibility that it might be fought over the issue of whether the USA should be run for the behalf of a specific foreign elite or not.
This X poll demonstrates the complete failure of the Narrative and the ability of the government-media complex to program people’s minds."
"There have been a lot of science fiction and apocalyptic novels written about the second American civil war. But I don’t think any of them ever anticipated the possibility that it might be fought over the issue of whether the USA should be run for the behalf of a specific foreign elite or not."
"This has never happened before: Throughout the U.S., Americans are turning against ‘their’ Government — not against just the Democratic Party, and not just against just the Republican Party, but against the Government itself..."
But on all issues of importance, there is no difference between the 'parties'.
"In a world-situation such as that, will the U.S. Establishment — the Deep State, the country’s billionaires, assisted by their high hired agents such as Stephen Bryen had been — be able to keep the billionaires’ operation, the U.S. empire, going, in ways that they imagine?"
Great question. But I would not sell the Deep State short. Their opposition is the American populace, which is not known for acuity.
You are wrong to compare the Deep State -- the billionaires, who are intensively networked together -- to the "populace," who are not. That's like comparing a corporation's management, the top executives, who were chosen by the corporation's Board, the representatives of the owners, to the corporation's workers, the employees (especially if they have no labor union, no collective bargaining). It's an unfair comparison. It is unfair to expect the employees to have cohesion like the management intrinsically MUST. So, your comparison of the "Deep State" to the "populace" is fundamentally wrong.
"So, your comparison of the "Deep State" to the "populace" is fundamentally wrong."
I made no comparison. You asked if the Deep State would be able to survive. My point was that the Deep State has no threat from a mostly stupid U.S. populace
All governments in the world are highly rejectable. We are tired of being slaves, tired of the lies and tired of the silly wars and politics.
"But I don’t think any of them ever anticipated the possibility that it might be fought over the issue of whether the USA should be run for the behalf of a specific foreign elite or not.
This X poll demonstrates the complete failure of the Narrative and the ability of the government-media complex to program people’s minds."
https://voxday.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/image-10.png
"There have been a lot of science fiction and apocalyptic novels written about the second American civil war. But I don’t think any of them ever anticipated the possibility that it might be fought over the issue of whether the USA should be run for the behalf of a specific foreign elite or not."
https://voxday.net/2025/04/17/everyone-knows/
"This has never happened before: Throughout the U.S., Americans are turning against ‘their’ Government — not against just the Democratic Party, and not just against just the Republican Party, but against the Government itself..."
But on all issues of importance, there is no difference between the 'parties'.
"In a world-situation such as that, will the U.S. Establishment — the Deep State, the country’s billionaires, assisted by their high hired agents such as Stephen Bryen had been — be able to keep the billionaires’ operation, the U.S. empire, going, in ways that they imagine?"
Great question. But I would not sell the Deep State short. Their opposition is the American populace, which is not known for acuity.
You are wrong to compare the Deep State -- the billionaires, who are intensively networked together -- to the "populace," who are not. That's like comparing a corporation's management, the top executives, who were chosen by the corporation's Board, the representatives of the owners, to the corporation's workers, the employees (especially if they have no labor union, no collective bargaining). It's an unfair comparison. It is unfair to expect the employees to have cohesion like the management intrinsically MUST. So, your comparison of the "Deep State" to the "populace" is fundamentally wrong.
"So, your comparison of the "Deep State" to the "populace" is fundamentally wrong."
I made no comparison. You asked if the Deep State would be able to survive. My point was that the Deep State has no threat from a mostly stupid U.S. populace