Biden’s plans to start WW3 either in Ukraine or in Taiwan
ericzuesse.substack.com
Eric Zuesse U.S. President Joe Biden’s interview with TIME magazine, published on June 4th, is informative about U.S. President Joe Biden’s plans to provoke both Russia and China into WW3 — using the war in Ukraine as the excuse for an American invasion of Russia, and using as an excuse to invade China a declaration of independence from China’s Government by Taiwan’s government, for which the U.S. has long been propagandizing within Taiwan, and has even been donating to Taiwan’s government U.S. weapons, in order to encourage it to declare its independence from China and so to become invaded by China so that the U.S. and it allies can cry out against ‘China’s aggression’ and then invade China to punish it for that ‘aggression’ — but what would that ‘aggression’ by China be ‘aggression’ against? Would it be ‘aggression’ against a separatist Province of China, which America has been arming in order that Taiwan declare its independence? (As we shall see here, the U.S. Government itself has an official policy that “The United States acknowledges that all Chinese on either side of the Taiwan Strait maintain there is but one China and that Taiwan is a part of China.” That policy even has a name:
Biden’s plans to start WW3 either in Ukraine or in Taiwan
Biden’s plans to start WW3 either in Ukraine…
Biden’s plans to start WW3 either in Ukraine or in Taiwan
Eric Zuesse U.S. President Joe Biden’s interview with TIME magazine, published on June 4th, is informative about U.S. President Joe Biden’s plans to provoke both Russia and China into WW3 — using the war in Ukraine as the excuse for an American invasion of Russia, and using as an excuse to invade China a declaration of independence from China’s Government by Taiwan’s government, for which the U.S. has long been propagandizing within Taiwan, and has even been donating to Taiwan’s government U.S. weapons, in order to encourage it to declare its independence from China and so to become invaded by China so that the U.S. and it allies can cry out against ‘China’s aggression’ and then invade China to punish it for that ‘aggression’ — but what would that ‘aggression’ by China be ‘aggression’ against? Would it be ‘aggression’ against a separatist Province of China, which America has been arming in order that Taiwan declare its independence? (As we shall see here, the U.S. Government itself has an official policy that “The United States acknowledges that all Chinese on either side of the Taiwan Strait maintain there is but one China and that Taiwan is a part of China.” That policy even has a name: