We’re watching a shadow play - one where real death leaps offscreen into a terror-stricken audience.
The 6/22 USA attack was in the works for decades and announced TO THE DAY over two years ago (posted that here on Substack and elsewhere before it happened). All the recent fits and starts were so much empty posturing.
Trump is a noxious empty suit - PT Barnum without the wit and humor - and Netanyahu is a demented, sociopathic, delusional front man. Superstitious, secret-society global capital seems to be trying to turn the Middle East into their headquarters. Who knows where this is going…
Thanks for the question. The answer is far more than merely "The Israel Lobby" because, as I have indicated, AIPAC is over half of that and their 2nd-largest donor, Miriam Adelson, gave them only $5 million though she gave the Trump campaign $105 million. I believe that the answer is that all of the approximately 30% of American billionaires who are Jews (virtually if not ALL of whom are Zionists), as well as of the perhaps 50% of American billionaires who believe in the whole Bible (like Hitler and also evangelical Christians did and do (though emphasizing different passages from it) are organized by the Jewish state and its many Christian friends, into an unbeatable political force in America's 'democracy' so as to possess collectively an effective veto-power against ANY political candidate who does NOT support Israel; Israel calls any such "anti-Semites,"and no U.S. political candidate whom Israel and other Zionists call an "anti-Semite" can likely win either Party's nomination. It's the effectiveness of the Zionist lie that every Jew supports Israel against Palestinians and especially against Iran. That obliterates the truth from U.S.-and-'allied' 'news'-media. The vast majority of voters are willing fools.
(paraphrase) "Political candidates who do not support Israel are vetoed."
But this would control the selection of candidates it would not amount to control of the government - i.e. this collection of selected candidates once elected - would it?
And in any case here we are talking congress are we not? What effect on the govt of the usa does congress have today? It seems to me to be largely irrelevant.
THE WAY THAT THE BILLIONAIRES CONTROL THE GOVERNMENT IS VIA THEIR EFFECTIVE VETO-POWER OVER EACH OF THE PARTIES' NOMINEES FOR POLITICAL OFFICE. That's how they do it. And they do it not ONLY by their donating over half of all the donations to the national political candidates, but ALSO by their controlling the corporations that are the major advertisers and that therefore keep all political media in their thrall (plus many of the major media are directly owned or controlled by billionaires), etc. But it is their VETO power over the Parties' nominees that is the KEY.
But it s definitely the way that it is done, and this has been so for thousands of years: the super-rich control the public by vetoing anyone who represents the public, instead of representing only various factions of just the super-rich, to participate in law-writing and in establishing and controlling the Government's policy-priorities.
That's far too inexact and general for practical use to point to a mechanism of 'controlling' a government.
That's in the same area as any other general trend or tendency. They make for results tending this way or that but not for 'control'.
'upper class' accents in England for instance biasing selection of applicants.
Or 'Catholicism' was often a biasing factor.
And so on.
Exulting that 'we got an upper class Catholic into the job' is not the same as necessarily having control over that person is it?
This notion presumes in the case of America 400 congressmen each being carefully selected by the 'super-rich' as acceptable candidates - and being none can be sure the candidacy will be successful then we've got to, say, double that to allow for alternative candidate's success.
So before the election we moot a picture of something like 1000 candidates all essentially alike as being 'acceptable' to the 'super rich' and more that, after appointment if successful, amenable to total control.
If I were super rich why would I waste my time and energies in that way were it even possible?
Say I want to get my way in this local area, shire, province, country town maybe. I have a business with many employees. Thousands. I point out to the council that it would help my business greatly if I could expand into that 5 acres to the north and gently mention that failing such an opportunity it would be in my interest to relocate to the adjoining State.
What care who 'runs' that area? They will all bow before my logic.
There is no '25 words or less' answer - but there is a process of discovery - which never ends - and in my case started about 25 years ago with internet presence beginning 10 years ago - www.crushlimbraw.com - with the associated Limbraw Library as used below. It is NOT for casual readers....requires lots of reading!
Example: After reading the following brief summary......try to estimate when this war against Western Civilization will end:
"DaWhore who sits on many waters......is none other than the one named in both Old and New Testaments - whose Covenant with God was ended in 70 AD via Operation Titus - and is now DaSynagogue of Satan (DSOS) - headquartered in DaCity of London with branches all over Western Civilization - and is simply the same cult that has been the bane of mankind, preaching the art of self-destruction by debt suicide - https://crushlimbraw.blogspot.com/search?q=Synagogue+of+satan&m=1 - took down every empire it inhabited as a parasite.....our turn is next!"
Hint: Complicating everything is the fact that only a tiny minority of Western Civ can see beyond our daily interests - most are actual servants of DSOS - including much of churchianity!
To me that's simply obfuscation and obscurantism. Stating things clearly is the epitome of science, logic, reason, truth. When it is not done one is justifiably suspicious and dismissive I think.
We’re watching a shadow play - one where real death leaps offscreen into a terror-stricken audience.
The 6/22 USA attack was in the works for decades and announced TO THE DAY over two years ago (posted that here on Substack and elsewhere before it happened). All the recent fits and starts were so much empty posturing.
Trump is a noxious empty suit - PT Barnum without the wit and humor - and Netanyahu is a demented, sociopathic, delusional front man. Superstitious, secret-society global capital seems to be trying to turn the Middle East into their headquarters. Who knows where this is going…
I am unclear as to how the Israeli government owns the US govt.
Perhaps I misunderstood the title? It perhaps means "examples demonstrating that Israel owns the US govt"?
It is certainly well demonstrated.
But I am not clear on the mechanism.
Which I thought/hoped this interesting post would explain.
Just how is it done?
Thanks for the question. The answer is far more than merely "The Israel Lobby" because, as I have indicated, AIPAC is over half of that and their 2nd-largest donor, Miriam Adelson, gave them only $5 million though she gave the Trump campaign $105 million. I believe that the answer is that all of the approximately 30% of American billionaires who are Jews (virtually if not ALL of whom are Zionists), as well as of the perhaps 50% of American billionaires who believe in the whole Bible (like Hitler and also evangelical Christians did and do (though emphasizing different passages from it) are organized by the Jewish state and its many Christian friends, into an unbeatable political force in America's 'democracy' so as to possess collectively an effective veto-power against ANY political candidate who does NOT support Israel; Israel calls any such "anti-Semites,"and no U.S. political candidate whom Israel and other Zionists call an "anti-Semite" can likely win either Party's nomination. It's the effectiveness of the Zionist lie that every Jew supports Israel against Palestinians and especially against Iran. That obliterates the truth from U.S.-and-'allied' 'news'-media. The vast majority of voters are willing fools.
Thank you for that.
So the mechanism is :
(paraphrase) "Political candidates who do not support Israel are vetoed."
But this would control the selection of candidates it would not amount to control of the government - i.e. this collection of selected candidates once elected - would it?
And in any case here we are talking congress are we not? What effect on the govt of the usa does congress have today? It seems to me to be largely irrelevant.
THE WAY THAT THE BILLIONAIRES CONTROL THE GOVERNMENT IS VIA THEIR EFFECTIVE VETO-POWER OVER EACH OF THE PARTIES' NOMINEES FOR POLITICAL OFFICE. That's how they do it. And they do it not ONLY by their donating over half of all the donations to the national political candidates, but ALSO by their controlling the corporations that are the major advertisers and that therefore keep all political media in their thrall (plus many of the major media are directly owned or controlled by billionaires), etc. But it is their VETO power over the Parties' nominees that is the KEY.
@ Eric Zuesse
Yes, Eric, that's what I opined in my earlier post. I say again I don't see that as sufficient control to qualify for 'controlling the govt'.
But it s definitely the way that it is done, and this has been so for thousands of years: the super-rich control the public by vetoing anyone who represents the public, instead of representing only various factions of just the super-rich, to participate in law-writing and in establishing and controlling the Government's policy-priorities.
That's far too inexact and general for practical use to point to a mechanism of 'controlling' a government.
That's in the same area as any other general trend or tendency. They make for results tending this way or that but not for 'control'.
'upper class' accents in England for instance biasing selection of applicants.
Or 'Catholicism' was often a biasing factor.
And so on.
Exulting that 'we got an upper class Catholic into the job' is not the same as necessarily having control over that person is it?
This notion presumes in the case of America 400 congressmen each being carefully selected by the 'super-rich' as acceptable candidates - and being none can be sure the candidacy will be successful then we've got to, say, double that to allow for alternative candidate's success.
So before the election we moot a picture of something like 1000 candidates all essentially alike as being 'acceptable' to the 'super rich' and more that, after appointment if successful, amenable to total control.
If I were super rich why would I waste my time and energies in that way were it even possible?
Say I want to get my way in this local area, shire, province, country town maybe. I have a business with many employees. Thousands. I point out to the council that it would help my business greatly if I could expand into that 5 acres to the north and gently mention that failing such an opportunity it would be in my interest to relocate to the adjoining State.
What care who 'runs' that area? They will all bow before my logic.
And those are the tools I would use.
There is no '25 words or less' answer - but there is a process of discovery - which never ends - and in my case started about 25 years ago with internet presence beginning 10 years ago - www.crushlimbraw.com - with the associated Limbraw Library as used below. It is NOT for casual readers....requires lots of reading!
Example: After reading the following brief summary......try to estimate when this war against Western Civilization will end:
"DaWhore who sits on many waters......is none other than the one named in both Old and New Testaments - whose Covenant with God was ended in 70 AD via Operation Titus - and is now DaSynagogue of Satan (DSOS) - headquartered in DaCity of London with branches all over Western Civilization - and is simply the same cult that has been the bane of mankind, preaching the art of self-destruction by debt suicide - https://crushlimbraw.blogspot.com/search?q=Synagogue+of+satan&m=1 - took down every empire it inhabited as a parasite.....our turn is next!"
Hint: Complicating everything is the fact that only a tiny minority of Western Civ can see beyond our daily interests - most are actual servants of DSOS - including much of churchianity!
Sad......but true!
To me that's simply obfuscation and obscurantism. Stating things clearly is the epitome of science, logic, reason, truth. When it is not done one is justifiably suspicious and dismissive I think.