All religions have racist, primitive, violent, backward teachings because they were invented by racist, primitive, violent, backward humans in ancient times. Atheist Zionists took up these teachings to manipulate gullible Jews, of which there were and are many.
But all religions have more enlightened teachings as well and the sensible ones, sensibly do not see the primitive teachings as valid in this age. Unfortunately Judaism and Jews have retained truly backward beliefs about their own superiority as humans and their own fictional reality as victims, and their own rightness. Combine all this with lunatic teachings from ancient times and you get the psychopathic state of hate, Sickrael.
In truth the Bible teaches the opposite. One has to follow it all through the history during which it was written. The whole race this brought to a good conclusion by the Apostle Paul in the tiny book of Philemon, where Paul wrote to a Roman convert whose slave escaped from him and met up with Paul. Paul sends the former slave back with this letter, that encourages the former slave owner to welcome back the slave as a full and free brother. The former slave is believed to have become a leader in one of the Christian churches as a full brother and equal. At least in teaching, that ended slavery once and for all. Many later have had to grow up into that, but the true Christian faith has no place for slavery in it at all. It ended it once and for all. We are all one in Christ. That's how the Bible concluded on the issue. Finished.
Well the Romans were enlightened for their times and slaves could gain their freedom in a variety of ways. That was happening before Christianity was invented.
The Bible is not history. It is stories written by men in the times seeking to consolidate power, gather followers and push their agenda. Patently slavery did not end for Christians then because Christian Europe and England were in the slave trade and so very Christian United States was founded on slavery and was the last to end it, many decades after the enlightened English banned it.
You missed what I said which is that the Bible climaxed in Jesus and the New Testament which clearly taught against slavery. The problem is with those who claim to be following what it teaches but who have not truly followed it. That's called hypocrisy. You are right to criticize Britain and early America for practicing slavery, which was a very common practice all over the world for centuries, but finish the rest of the story. It was Christians in America and in Britain who called both nations to what the Bible actually teaches and both nations ended slavery. Watch the movie Amazing Grace about Wilberforce in England and then watch Amasod (sp?) by Steven Spielberg which shows how John Quincy Adams argued the case in the Supreme Court that led to the ending of slavery in America, championed by Christians who took the Bible seriously and acted accordingly. And yes the Bible is real history. Watch documentaries like those at Patterns of Evidence.
Sorry if I misunderstood. And yes, it was Christians who pushed to end slavery first in England and later in the US.
Slavery has long been with humans and still remains in some less developed societies. And there are modern forms of slavery such as illegal workers in the US who form a bedrock for the economy and who are exploited.
This whole religion thing, this Hebrew Bible, the Torah, totally sickening. What kind of God talks about murdering all these people? By now the world should have outgrown this kind of stuff.
In truth the Bible teaches the opposite. One has to follow it all through the history during which it was written. The whole race this brought to a good conclusion by the Apostle Paul in the tiny book of Philemon, where Paul wrote to a Roman convert whose slave escaped from him and met up with Paul. Paul sends the former slave back with this letter, that encourages the former slave owner to welcome back the slave as a full and free brother. The former slave is believed to have become a leader in one of the Christian churches as a full brother and equal. At least in teaching, that ended slavery once and for all. Many later have had to grow up into that, but the true Christian faith has no place for slavery in it at all. It ended it once and for all. We are all one in Christ. That's how the Bible concluded on the issue. Finished.
* Where is the evidence that 6 million Jews were killed? This number was bandied around by Jews since the 19th century.
Oddly, at Auschwitz there was a plaque commemorating 4 million people were killed there by the Nazis. Most of those were Jews, shall we say 80%, conservatively? That's 3.2 million Jews.
In 1990 that plaque was replaced by one stating 1½ million people were killed, which means 80% of 1½ million = 1.2 million Jews. This represents a drop of 2 million Jews, yet the 6 million was kept afloat in the official narrative.
The Red Cross visited the concentration camps, and in its final 3-volume 1600 page report there is no mention of gassing, and the total number of people killed in the 15 biggest concentration camps was stated as 271,000, of whom 50% were Jewsih, according to the RC. The 271,000 was revised up several times, the last time in 1993 when it was put at 296,081, let's say 300,000, implying 150,000 Jews.
Using various annual edition of the World Almanac Book of Facts, which is almanac of the “American Jewish Committee”, we can deduce a number of 765,000 Jews who died in the camps.
Walter Sanning calculates 300,000. So, how unreasonable is to say the number ranges between 150,000 and 765,000 at most, with a likelihood of 300,000?
* The Jews were gassed in those extermination camps. Where is the forensic evidence? You're telling me that rickety wooden doors served to stop the lethal gas from escaping from those gas chambers. Really?
There are no autopsy reports. 1 of the world's foremost holocaust experts, the late Raul Hilberg, said at the Zündel trial he “could not think of any reason why a scientist would undertake such a study”.
Someone's body who has died from cyanide poisoning turns pink/cherry red. There are no reports of such.
The walls of the chambers indicated as homicidal gas chambers do not show the typical Prussian blue staining; the walls of the delousing chambers, however do. How do you explain that, Eric?
* There was systemic intent on the part of the Nazis.
Was there? So who gave the order? Hitler? The leadership level immediately below him?
Be that as it may. Let's see what Hilberg has to say about it.
When asked in 1983 how the extermination of European Jewry took place without an order, he replied:
“What began in 1941 was a process of destruction not planned in advance, not organized centrally by any agency. There was no blueprint and there was no budget for destructive measures. They were taken step by step, one step at a time. Thus came about not so much a plan being carried out, but an incredible meeting of minds, a consensus – **mind reading by a far-flung bureaucracy**.”
Really, Eric? Mind reading? Telepathy? Do you call that serious?
From the first sentence that "this article might offend everybody" I KNEW I was not going to be one of them!!! LMHO ROFLR!!! That spelled it for me that I needed to read the article in its entirety.
Thank you so much for it!!!!!!!!!
I forgot about the OT scriptures you quoted. And Totally forgot about the part "brood of vipers" LMFHO ROFLR. It makes me wonder why one of the buildings in the Vatican had the snakes eyes made out of stained glass at its very altar and the outside made exactly into the shape of A Snake's head. I forgot what the bldg is called. I mean why did they have to go to that kind of length to commit to the allegiance of the snake, knowing that the snake was a symbol of the enemy of Jesus!!
I am gonna book mark this article as I need to get into each and every one of its hyper links in full.
FANTASTIC JOB!!! I mean all of your articles need to be book marked and not just this one!! I quoted that John 8:44 to various parties in the past quite few times. Yeah that's how much of "God's chosen people" they are. Not to mention that in the book of Revelation they are referred to as the Synagogue of Satan in Chapter 3 I think. If that doesn't round up the topic nothing will.
In The Talmud they claim that Jesus is boiling in bucket of feces in hell for what "he's done to them"!!!!! And how do they "know" that?!?!? they claim that they "conjured up" his soul and he told them so!!! I mean look at the arrogance of these low life criminals. Talking about some completely PhuQed up crowd. Peter Schäfer wrote "Jesus in the Talmud" and spoke about that. At the time he wrote the book he was the Head of Hebrew Studies at one of the Renown US Universities. I think it's Princeton University but I am not sure.
Thank you so much for letting us post here. If I had an ATM card I certainly would have made a donation but I don't. I am a loser (LOL). I buy a gift card and see if I can make a contribution from that at least for a coffee.
And thank YOU for being one of very few people who would even want to read beyond that introductory paragraph! However, when you refer to the Talmud, that isn't part of the Jewish canon. It was written after the year 500, whereas the Torah, which defines Judaism as a religion, was written and canonized around a thousand years prior to that. The Talmud is merely rabbis writings interpreting the Torah and the later books of the Old Testament. Furthermore, as this article pointed out, the New Testament was NOT written by followers of Jesus, but instead by followers of Paul's new religion, which is anti-Jewish; and, so, those anti-Jewish 'words of Jesus' were written by Paul's followers, who never met nor heard Jesus.
> .... the Talmud, that isn't part of the Jewish canon. The Talmud is merely rabbis writings interpreting the Torah and the later books of the Old Testament.
**merely**, Eric? The Babylonian Talmud is held sacred by Jews studied to this very day.
Furthermore, in some branches of Orthodox Judaism, Talmudic rulings can take precedence over a plain reading of the Torah when clarifying or elaborating the law.
Thank you so very much for your informative reply. I knew bout the synaptic gospels but not about the Talmud (thank you so much). I was aware that they just carried the names of these guys, but that did not mean they were the authors. Also Paul's epistles with the book of Luke were the first book that made the NT, the others were added later. You remind me of The Skeptic Society's Atheists. They were Xtremely scholarly!!! They were simply Amazing.
"Nonetheless, the Trump Administration and many throughout the world spout Israel’s lie that to be anti-Israel is to be anti-Jew (an “anti-Semite”); and, for example, prestigious American universities have expelled students for speaking publicly against Israel’s slaughter of Gazans — and the U.S. Government, despite the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment (which prohibits the Government’s suppressing public expressions of political opinions), has halted federal funds to universities that DON’T expel such students"
All good people (of any religion) who truly know God in their personal experience knows Him as a God of love and holiness. Scriptures must be filtered through man in the process of becoming visible to the human world. Therefore, there is error and misinterpretation. Jesus, once and for all showed us God’s response to evil. He forbade violence and called on his Father to forgive those who attacked him (”They do not know what they do.”) The Father brought about the resurrection and turned evil into good. Murdering innocent people and children is abhorrent to God. No religion should be used to support it. Defending oneself and others against evil and violence would seem to me to be perfectly acceptable. A good portion of the scripture in this article is inaccurate.
I am stunned when people compare the jews to the Germans. israel was founded by bolshevik communist jews from russia and poland who many of them participated in the slaughter of 60 million in russia and tens of 100's of Germans in poland. ISAREL MUST BE COMPARED TO BOLSHEVIK COMMUNIST JEWS not the Germans who tried to destroy the jewish communsit russia.
anybody believes in the hollowcaust the way the jews tell it cannot be against anything israel does being you legitimize the demonic death cult state by puking out their propaganda
"Zionism had been an intrinsic part of the Jewish faith ever since that faith’s Scripture, the Torah, which includes those passages, which Israel is now trying to finalize in both Gaza and the West Bank..."
In the Torah law & Prophets itself testified that their days were going to be numbered, and that they would be "cast out" of the Kingdom ( Mt 21:43) and "of all the righteous blood shed from Abel forward" (Mt. 23:35,ff) was on their head in AD 70 temple & destruction of Jerusalem. This history and those passages of Israel trying to finalize today ended in AD 70. Finished. They are a fake, invented people today.
In re: your contention that "Paul created Christianity in the year 49 0r 50 in order to get back at Jesus’s brother James [concerning circumcision,]" see Acts 15 directly addressing the alleged need for circumcision. 15:13: "And after they had held their peace, James answered, saying, Men and brethren, hearken unto me: .... 19 Wherefore my sentence is, that we trouble not them, which from among the Gentiles are turned to God: 20 But that we write unto them, that they abstain from pollutions of idols, and from fornication, and from things strangled, and from blood."
Interesting article. Some of what you wrote I agree with while other sections I totally dismiss as unfounded opinions. I'm a big boy so am not personally offended.
One of my favorite quotes from 2 Cor 5:21 (AFV) "For He made Him Who knew no sin to be sin for us, so that we might become the righteousness of God in Him."
There are many OT scriptures to support what Paul wrote in that quote.
Also, according to your "post" Paul must have been a "mad man" spending his adult live presenting
the good news for no monetary gain and eventually being executed by a Roman Emperor because Paul would not worship him as a god.
All religions have racist, primitive, violent, backward teachings because they were invented by racist, primitive, violent, backward humans in ancient times. Atheist Zionists took up these teachings to manipulate gullible Jews, of which there were and are many.
But all religions have more enlightened teachings as well and the sensible ones, sensibly do not see the primitive teachings as valid in this age. Unfortunately Judaism and Jews have retained truly backward beliefs about their own superiority as humans and their own fictional reality as victims, and their own rightness. Combine all this with lunatic teachings from ancient times and you get the psychopathic state of hate, Sickrael.
In truth the Bible teaches the opposite. One has to follow it all through the history during which it was written. The whole race this brought to a good conclusion by the Apostle Paul in the tiny book of Philemon, where Paul wrote to a Roman convert whose slave escaped from him and met up with Paul. Paul sends the former slave back with this letter, that encourages the former slave owner to welcome back the slave as a full and free brother. The former slave is believed to have become a leader in one of the Christian churches as a full brother and equal. At least in teaching, that ended slavery once and for all. Many later have had to grow up into that, but the true Christian faith has no place for slavery in it at all. It ended it once and for all. We are all one in Christ. That's how the Bible concluded on the issue. Finished.
Well the Romans were enlightened for their times and slaves could gain their freedom in a variety of ways. That was happening before Christianity was invented.
The Bible is not history. It is stories written by men in the times seeking to consolidate power, gather followers and push their agenda. Patently slavery did not end for Christians then because Christian Europe and England were in the slave trade and so very Christian United States was founded on slavery and was the last to end it, many decades after the enlightened English banned it.
You missed what I said which is that the Bible climaxed in Jesus and the New Testament which clearly taught against slavery. The problem is with those who claim to be following what it teaches but who have not truly followed it. That's called hypocrisy. You are right to criticize Britain and early America for practicing slavery, which was a very common practice all over the world for centuries, but finish the rest of the story. It was Christians in America and in Britain who called both nations to what the Bible actually teaches and both nations ended slavery. Watch the movie Amazing Grace about Wilberforce in England and then watch Amasod (sp?) by Steven Spielberg which shows how John Quincy Adams argued the case in the Supreme Court that led to the ending of slavery in America, championed by Christians who took the Bible seriously and acted accordingly. And yes the Bible is real history. Watch documentaries like those at Patterns of Evidence.
Sorry if I misunderstood. And yes, it was Christians who pushed to end slavery first in England and later in the US.
Slavery has long been with humans and still remains in some less developed societies. And there are modern forms of slavery such as illegal workers in the US who form a bedrock for the economy and who are exploited.
This whole religion thing, this Hebrew Bible, the Torah, totally sickening. What kind of God talks about murdering all these people? By now the world should have outgrown this kind of stuff.
In truth the Bible teaches the opposite. One has to follow it all through the history during which it was written. The whole race this brought to a good conclusion by the Apostle Paul in the tiny book of Philemon, where Paul wrote to a Roman convert whose slave escaped from him and met up with Paul. Paul sends the former slave back with this letter, that encourages the former slave owner to welcome back the slave as a full and free brother. The former slave is believed to have become a leader in one of the Christian churches as a full brother and equal. At least in teaching, that ended slavery once and for all. Many later have had to grow up into that, but the true Christian faith has no place for slavery in it at all. It ended it once and for all. We are all one in Christ. That's how the Bible concluded on the issue. Finished.
Anyone who still considers the OT a holy book needs his head examined.
The Holocaust did happen? Really?
* Where is the evidence that 6 million Jews were killed? This number was bandied around by Jews since the 19th century.
Oddly, at Auschwitz there was a plaque commemorating 4 million people were killed there by the Nazis. Most of those were Jews, shall we say 80%, conservatively? That's 3.2 million Jews.
In 1990 that plaque was replaced by one stating 1½ million people were killed, which means 80% of 1½ million = 1.2 million Jews. This represents a drop of 2 million Jews, yet the 6 million was kept afloat in the official narrative.
The Red Cross visited the concentration camps, and in its final 3-volume 1600 page report there is no mention of gassing, and the total number of people killed in the 15 biggest concentration camps was stated as 271,000, of whom 50% were Jewsih, according to the RC. The 271,000 was revised up several times, the last time in 1993 when it was put at 296,081, let's say 300,000, implying 150,000 Jews.
Using various annual edition of the World Almanac Book of Facts, which is almanac of the “American Jewish Committee”, we can deduce a number of 765,000 Jews who died in the camps.
Walter Sanning calculates 300,000. So, how unreasonable is to say the number ranges between 150,000 and 765,000 at most, with a likelihood of 300,000?
* The Jews were gassed in those extermination camps. Where is the forensic evidence? You're telling me that rickety wooden doors served to stop the lethal gas from escaping from those gas chambers. Really?
There are no autopsy reports. 1 of the world's foremost holocaust experts, the late Raul Hilberg, said at the Zündel trial he “could not think of any reason why a scientist would undertake such a study”.
Someone's body who has died from cyanide poisoning turns pink/cherry red. There are no reports of such.
The walls of the chambers indicated as homicidal gas chambers do not show the typical Prussian blue staining; the walls of the delousing chambers, however do. How do you explain that, Eric?
* There was systemic intent on the part of the Nazis.
Was there? So who gave the order? Hitler? The leadership level immediately below him?
Be that as it may. Let's see what Hilberg has to say about it.
When asked in 1983 how the extermination of European Jewry took place without an order, he replied:
“What began in 1941 was a process of destruction not planned in advance, not organized centrally by any agency. There was no blueprint and there was no budget for destructive measures. They were taken step by step, one step at a time. Thus came about not so much a plan being carried out, but an incredible meeting of minds, a consensus – **mind reading by a far-flung bureaucracy**.”
Really, Eric? Mind reading? Telepathy? Do you call that serious?
So - who exactly are the Jews? And who they are not - https://crushlimbraw.blogspot.com/2021/06/who-are-jews-and-who-they-are-not.html?m=0 - much more where this came from.
Will test your open-mindedness.....
From the first sentence that "this article might offend everybody" I KNEW I was not going to be one of them!!! LMHO ROFLR!!! That spelled it for me that I needed to read the article in its entirety.
Thank you so much for it!!!!!!!!!
I forgot about the OT scriptures you quoted. And Totally forgot about the part "brood of vipers" LMFHO ROFLR. It makes me wonder why one of the buildings in the Vatican had the snakes eyes made out of stained glass at its very altar and the outside made exactly into the shape of A Snake's head. I forgot what the bldg is called. I mean why did they have to go to that kind of length to commit to the allegiance of the snake, knowing that the snake was a symbol of the enemy of Jesus!!
I am gonna book mark this article as I need to get into each and every one of its hyper links in full.
FANTASTIC JOB!!! I mean all of your articles need to be book marked and not just this one!! I quoted that John 8:44 to various parties in the past quite few times. Yeah that's how much of "God's chosen people" they are. Not to mention that in the book of Revelation they are referred to as the Synagogue of Satan in Chapter 3 I think. If that doesn't round up the topic nothing will.
In The Talmud they claim that Jesus is boiling in bucket of feces in hell for what "he's done to them"!!!!! And how do they "know" that?!?!? they claim that they "conjured up" his soul and he told them so!!! I mean look at the arrogance of these low life criminals. Talking about some completely PhuQed up crowd. Peter Schäfer wrote "Jesus in the Talmud" and spoke about that. At the time he wrote the book he was the Head of Hebrew Studies at one of the Renown US Universities. I think it's Princeton University but I am not sure.
Thank you so much for letting us post here. If I had an ATM card I certainly would have made a donation but I don't. I am a loser (LOL). I buy a gift card and see if I can make a contribution from that at least for a coffee.
Thank you ever so much!!!!!
And thank YOU for being one of very few people who would even want to read beyond that introductory paragraph! However, when you refer to the Talmud, that isn't part of the Jewish canon. It was written after the year 500, whereas the Torah, which defines Judaism as a religion, was written and canonized around a thousand years prior to that. The Talmud is merely rabbis writings interpreting the Torah and the later books of the Old Testament. Furthermore, as this article pointed out, the New Testament was NOT written by followers of Jesus, but instead by followers of Paul's new religion, which is anti-Jewish; and, so, those anti-Jewish 'words of Jesus' were written by Paul's followers, who never met nor heard Jesus.
> .... the Talmud, that isn't part of the Jewish canon. The Talmud is merely rabbis writings interpreting the Torah and the later books of the Old Testament.
**merely**, Eric? The Babylonian Talmud is held sacred by Jews studied to this very day.
Furthermore, in some branches of Orthodox Judaism, Talmudic rulings can take precedence over a plain reading of the Torah when clarifying or elaborating the law.
I seem to recall both Leo Tolstoy and Thomas Jefferson claiming that Paul was the first corrupter of Christ's teachings.
Thank you so very much for your informative reply. I knew bout the synaptic gospels but not about the Talmud (thank you so much). I was aware that they just carried the names of these guys, but that did not mean they were the authors. Also Paul's epistles with the book of Luke were the first book that made the NT, the others were added later. You remind me of The Skeptic Society's Atheists. They were Xtremely scholarly!!! They were simply Amazing.
May you be Blessed Xponentiall Sir!!!
"Nonetheless, the Trump Administration and many throughout the world spout Israel’s lie that to be anti-Israel is to be anti-Jew (an “anti-Semite”); and, for example, prestigious American universities have expelled students for speaking publicly against Israel’s slaughter of Gazans — and the U.S. Government, despite the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment (which prohibits the Government’s suppressing public expressions of political opinions), has halted federal funds to universities that DON’T expel such students"
Yes, money talks, and Trump owes Zionists bigly.
Zionism is evil personified.
The truth!
All good people (of any religion) who truly know God in their personal experience knows Him as a God of love and holiness. Scriptures must be filtered through man in the process of becoming visible to the human world. Therefore, there is error and misinterpretation. Jesus, once and for all showed us God’s response to evil. He forbade violence and called on his Father to forgive those who attacked him (”They do not know what they do.”) The Father brought about the resurrection and turned evil into good. Murdering innocent people and children is abhorrent to God. No religion should be used to support it. Defending oneself and others against evil and violence would seem to me to be perfectly acceptable. A good portion of the scripture in this article is inaccurate.
I am stunned when people compare the jews to the Germans. israel was founded by bolshevik communist jews from russia and poland who many of them participated in the slaughter of 60 million in russia and tens of 100's of Germans in poland. ISAREL MUST BE COMPARED TO BOLSHEVIK COMMUNIST JEWS not the Germans who tried to destroy the jewish communsit russia.
anybody believes in the hollowcaust the way the jews tell it cannot be against anything israel does being you legitimize the demonic death cult state by puking out their propaganda
"Zionism had been an intrinsic part of the Jewish faith ever since that faith’s Scripture, the Torah, which includes those passages, which Israel is now trying to finalize in both Gaza and the West Bank..."
In the Torah law & Prophets itself testified that their days were going to be numbered, and that they would be "cast out" of the Kingdom ( Mt 21:43) and "of all the righteous blood shed from Abel forward" (Mt. 23:35,ff) was on their head in AD 70 temple & destruction of Jerusalem. This history and those passages of Israel trying to finalize today ended in AD 70. Finished. They are a fake, invented people today.
In re: your contention that "Paul created Christianity in the year 49 0r 50 in order to get back at Jesus’s brother James [concerning circumcision,]" see Acts 15 directly addressing the alleged need for circumcision. 15:13: "And after they had held their peace, James answered, saying, Men and brethren, hearken unto me: .... 19 Wherefore my sentence is, that we trouble not them, which from among the Gentiles are turned to God: 20 But that we write unto them, that they abstain from pollutions of idols, and from fornication, and from things strangled, and from blood."
There was no 'holocaust'. Period. Its idiotic to believe it and its been proven false.
jews are NOT Biblical Israelites, and share no kinship with them. They admit it in their own writings, plus its proven over and over.
Jesus was indeed "antsemitic" - even tho jews are for the most part not semites. He correctly called them 'of their father the devil'.
You are an idiot and a tool of the jew.
Interesting article. Some of what you wrote I agree with while other sections I totally dismiss as unfounded opinions. I'm a big boy so am not personally offended.
One of my favorite quotes from 2 Cor 5:21 (AFV) "For He made Him Who knew no sin to be sin for us, so that we might become the righteousness of God in Him."
There are many OT scriptures to support what Paul wrote in that quote.
Also, according to your "post" Paul must have been a "mad man" spending his adult live presenting
the good news for no monetary gain and eventually being executed by a Roman Emperor because Paul would not worship him as a god.
countries get destroyed if they do not worship israel. it is happening live in front of us
I liked your article. It really just goes to show that Zionism is merely the Jewish equivalent of Nazism. Thanks!
Which came first?
Zionism, I think, came first!
Judaism = DSOS > Zionism
Today's Jews are NOT Ancient Israel!
From DaLimbraw Library:
Judaism - https://crushlimbraw.blogspot.com/search?q=Judaism&updated-max=2024-05-28T10:30:00-07:00&max-results=20&by-date=false&m=1
DaSynagogue of Satan (DSOS) - https://crushlimbraw.blogspot.com/search?q=Synagogue+of+Satan+&m=1
Zionism - https://crushlimbraw.blogspot.com/search?q=Zionism&updated-max=2019-10-12T12:49:00-07:00&max-results=20&by-date=false&m=1
That is really rather intriguing!