I repost your article. But I would like to suggest they be reworked a little in order to reflect some kind of exhortations to the reader to this or that action or at the very least this or that thought pattern, belief.
I don't think the populace at large is given to serious study of contentious articles.
More likely to absorb that which exhorts, commands, demands and inspect the detail later for supporting facts, arguments, proofs.
Like this article is essentially a red danger flag isn't it? This lunatic could destroy us all. So if you want it presented to the 'dumb public', intent on its own affairs, disgusted, bored and angry about the wider world and its insanity out there, then perhaps it should look like a 'danger flag'.
It is a "danger flag" and even a flag of extreme danger — the extreme dangerousness of the post-FDR U.S. Government (and of all of its colonies or 'allies').
No country that isn't YET an 'ally' of the U.S. Government should have and display anything but contempt for it, just as no country that wasn't already an 'ally' of Hitler's Government should have had and displayed anything but contempt for that Government. A supremacist Government, regardless of the country it rules, is determined to conquer the entire world. That's what it means for a Government to BE supremacist. What type of compromise is acceptable to such a Government? NONE, except a merely tactical, short-term, one, because such a Government is INTRINSICALLY hostile toward EVERY OTHER GOVERNMENT — aims to regime-change all that aren't already 'allies'. The Soviet Union on 23-24 August 1939 took that merely tactical, short-term, compromise, the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, which ended on 22 June 1941 when 3.5 million German and 700,000 German-allied troops suddenly invaded the Soviet Union; so, within less than two years that "compromise" abruptly ended and the Soviet Union suffered around 25 million dead but defeated Hitler. There should be no compromise at all with a supremacist Government — it is intrinsically the enemy of EVERY nation. It is at constant war against all.
I repost your article. But I would like to suggest they be reworked a little in order to reflect some kind of exhortations to the reader to this or that action or at the very least this or that thought pattern, belief.
I don't think the populace at large is given to serious study of contentious articles.
More likely to absorb that which exhorts, commands, demands and inspect the detail later for supporting facts, arguments, proofs.
Like this article is essentially a red danger flag isn't it? This lunatic could destroy us all. So if you want it presented to the 'dumb public', intent on its own affairs, disgusted, bored and angry about the wider world and its insanity out there, then perhaps it should look like a 'danger flag'.
Just saying. I could be wrong of course.
It is a "danger flag" and even a flag of extreme danger — the extreme dangerousness of the post-FDR U.S. Government (and of all of its colonies or 'allies').
No country that isn't YET an 'ally' of the U.S. Government should have and display anything but contempt for it, just as no country that wasn't already an 'ally' of Hitler's Government should have had and displayed anything but contempt for that Government. A supremacist Government, regardless of the country it rules, is determined to conquer the entire world. That's what it means for a Government to BE supremacist. What type of compromise is acceptable to such a Government? NONE, except a merely tactical, short-term, one, because such a Government is INTRINSICALLY hostile toward EVERY OTHER GOVERNMENT — aims to regime-change all that aren't already 'allies'. The Soviet Union on 23-24 August 1939 took that merely tactical, short-term, compromise, the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, which ended on 22 June 1941 when 3.5 million German and 700,000 German-allied troops suddenly invaded the Soviet Union; so, within less than two years that "compromise" abruptly ended and the Soviet Union suffered around 25 million dead but defeated Hitler. There should be no compromise at all with a supremacist Government — it is intrinsically the enemy of EVERY nation. It is at constant war against all.
Yep. I agree. Now to try to bring it to the attention of Mr and Mrs Everyman.
At least Trump's stupidity isn't as stupendous as Byden's and what's her face's.
Not everything is at it seems on the surface - https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/russian-svrs-latest-intel-west-preparing?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1351274&post_id=156102307&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=y7h5a&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email